May 16, 2026
When a property insurance claim runs into trouble (e.g., a denial, a settlement offer that doesn’t cover the actual damage, a carrier that stops communicating), two types of professionals can step in on behalf of the policyholder: a public adjuster and a property insurance attorney. Both work on the policyholder’s side, but they have different training, different authority, and different tools for moving a claim forward.
A public adjuster is most useful when the claim is active and the dispute centers on scope or valuation. An attorney becomes necessary when a claim has been denied, negotiations have stalled, or the carrier’s conduct suggests something more serious than a valuation disagreement. Some disputes start with a public adjuster and bring in a lawyer when early negotiations don’t resolve them.
If your property insurance claim has been denied or underpaid, our team at Kandell, Kandell & Petrie can review your situation. Contact us at (305)-858-2220 to get started.
A public adjuster is an independent, licensed professional who evaluates property damage and advocates for policyholders during the claim negotiation process. Public adjusters are not attorneys and do not provide legal advice, but they bring focused knowledge of damage documentation, policy review for coverage limits, and claim negotiation.
In practice, a public adjuster typically handles the following:
A property insurance attorney evaluates the legal position of a claim, including whether the carrier’s interpretation of the policy holds up and whether its handling of the claim has been proper.
In practice, a property insurance attorney handles the following:
The authority to pursue bad faith claims, invoke statutory remedies, or litigate is exclusive to attorneys. A public adjuster cannot represent a policyholder in court.
| Public Adjuster | Insurance Claim Attorney | |
| Role | Damage documentation and claim negotiation | Legal analysis, dispute escalation, litigation |
| Leverage | Stronger estimates and documentation | Legal remedies, bad faith claims, litigation |
| Suited for | Scope and valuation disputes | Denied claims, bad faith, stalled negotiations |
| Legal authority | Cannot provide legal advice or litigate | Full legal authority, including filing suit |
| Fees | Percentage of settlement | Contingency — no fee unless recovery is made |
If a claim is active and the dispute is primarily about scope or value, not about whether coverage applies, a public adjuster may be the right starting point.
Consider hiring a public adjuster for:
If those negotiations stall or the carrier takes a harder position, the calculus changes.
Some disputes move beyond what a public adjuster can resolve.
Consider the following circumstances when deciding when to hire an insurance claim attorney:
At Kandell, Kandell & Petrie, we exclusively handle property insurance legal disputes. When a client brings us a denied or disputed claim, our review begins with the full policy, the denial letter, the claim timeline, and the damage documentation. Our team identifies where the carrier’s position diverges from what the policy actually says and where the facts don’t support how the claim was handled.
From the moment of retention, all communications with the insurance company run through our office. Our clients don’t manage correspondence, respond to carrier inquiries, or negotiate estimates directly.
The goal is resolution before litigation. A demand letter goes out, dialogue opens with the carrier, and available pre-suit processes — mediation, appraisal, statutory notice requirements — create a structured path forward. When those options don’t move a claim, we litigate. Carriers who know our team is prepared to go to trial tend to negotiate differently. Litigation cases we handle rarely exceed one year.
Common questions about which professional to engage and when are addressed below.
It depends on where the claim stands. If coverage is not in dispute and the disagreement is about scope or value, a public adjuster may be the right starting point. If the claim has been denied, negotiations have stalled, or the carrier’s conduct has been unreasonable, consulting an attorney is the better next step.
Yes. Some policyholders engage a public adjuster early for documentation and initial negotiations, then bring in an attorney if the dispute escalates. If a claim moves toward litigation, the attorney assumes primary advocacy.
A denial shifts which type of representation is most useful. If the dispute is about scope or value, a public adjuster may still contribute. If the carrier denied coverage outright — citing an exclusion, a policy condition, or a legal argument — a property insurance attorney can evaluate whether that denial holds up and what remedies are available.
Frequent adjuster changes can significantly delay a claim. A public adjuster or attorney can help impose structure on the process. If the reassignments appear deliberate or part of a broader pattern, an attorney can assess whether the conduct meets the threshold for a bad faith claim.
The appraisal clause resolves disputes about the amount of a loss, not whether coverage applies. If both sides agree coverage exists but disagree on value, each side appoints an appraiser; an umpire decides if they can’t agree. An attorney can evaluate whether invoking it is the right strategic step for the specific dispute.
Not necessarily. Many disputes resolve before any lawsuit is filed. Legal representation, particularly from a firm with a track record of trying cases, often changes how a carrier engages with a claim. A case that has been stalled for months may move quickly once a demand letter and a notice of representation arrive.
If your claim has been denied, significantly underpaid, or stalled, there may be more available to you than the carrier’s current position suggests. At Kandell, Kandell & Petrie, our team reviews the policy, the denial, the timeline, and the documentation and takes over the process from there.
Contact us at (305)-858-2220 to discuss your claim with our team.